Menu

Leave a Message

Thank you for your message. We will be in touch with you shortly.

Who Wants to Be A Trillionaire?

The media and politicians love a scapegoat and a headline and the one that will soon be delivered like red meat on a gilded platter is about to hit our shores. Brace yourself, it's coming! The world's first Trillionaire is about to arrive and while many will celebrate this, others will use this as the mascot to define the rich.  "The rich" is a common theme right now driving political narratives around the globe but like all things these days, this will be the penultimate mascot of what rich is and I fear it won't be pretty.

 

Should anyone be worth a trillion dollars?  I'll leave that aside. That's not my point. This is my point:  the word trillionaire is so other-worldly that it defines a trend, the exaggerated, growing, rapidly expanding divide between extreme rich and poor. It makes a very engaging and captivating headline. It is certain to fuel anger. It is certain to cause dramatic political shifts and it's doing so already. What will be forgotten in all this is what it means to be Trillionaire-rich and all the other kinds of rich. It will be lumped together with all others perceived as rich to demonize all of them. Currently, "the rich" are mostly my clients, people who can afford to buy a home. Sorry, you think someone buying a home for $500,000 is NOT rich?  Think again. Only 30-40 million homes in the US are worth that, a relatively small minority with approx 100 million homes worth less than $500,000. Just about 600,000 homes are worth $2 million or more.

 

They say 'the rich' pay around 40% of all Federal taxes. What 'they' omit is that the rich paying these taxes are mostly high earners. Those who borrow against stocks or earn via capital gains pay significantly lower tax rates. Someone worth $20 million lives an entirely different life to someone worth $100 million yet 'they' deem these two as the same while they are not. Far from it. Another looming question: should you be taxed on income or net worth? Right now, real estate taxes are based on the value of a product, although how that value is calculated varies considerably from state to state. Many who argue against real estate tax argue in favor of taxing wealthy people based on their net worth, not their income. Would you be ok being taxed on your net worth? What if you bought your home for $500,0000 and it's worth $2.5 million today? Should you be taxed only when you sell or based on what it is worth?
 
 
If New York is a window into the future, know this:  what at one point was supposed to be a "tax the billionaires" war-cry, soon morphed into a "tax the rich" war-cry which now applies to 10,000 people, not just the 150 billionaires who live in New York. Wow, that was fast.

Work With Us

Ken interprets market data, staying in constant communication and offering valuable insight that then translates into an informed decision.

Contact Us